Study by Public Accountability Initiative

A new study by the Public Accountability Initiative shows that many of those who were given a public platform through corporate media to speak as “experts” on the potential war in Syria were not at all impartial or objective, having deep ties to defense contractors and other players in the military-industrial-complex.

“Though Hadley’s undisclosed conflict is particularly egregious, it is not unique. The following report documents the industry ties of Hadley, 21 other media commentators, and seven think tanks that participated in the media debate around Syria. Like Hadley, these individuals and organizations have strong ties to defense contractors and other defense- and foreign policy-focused firms with a vested interest in the Syria debate, but they were presented to their audiences with a veneer of expertise and independence, as former military officials, retired diplomats, and independent think tanks.”

Conflicts of Interest in the Syria Debate, An analysis of the defense industry ties of experts and think tanks who commented on military intervention

“Retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, a former commander of the U.S. Central Command, also made several media appearances to discuss the Syrian situation and cautioned that the kind of limited intervention that was being proposed has in the past been difficult to accomplish. But in the five appearances covered by the study, his ties to the defense industry were not disclosed.

Zinni has been on the board of directors of BAE Systems, a top defense contractor, since 2002 and was board chairman from 2009 to 2012. The company specializes in cybersecurity, intelligence analysis and several weapons systems. Zinni, in addition, sits on the board of advisers of DC Capital Partners, a private equity firm that focuses on investments in intelligence, homeland security and other sectors.”

Media Analysts in Syria Debate Have Ties to Defense Contractors

Source: The Financial Times, “US military: Arms and the Man for Change”

Source: The Financial Times, “US military: Arms and the Man for Change”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *